Friday, 23 July 2021
Something Cult, Foreign-Language or Indie #250: Mean Creek (2004).
Something Cult, Foreign-Language or Indie #249: 20 Feet from Stardom (2013).
Wednesday, 14 July 2021
Something Cult, Foreign-Language or Indie #248: CJ7 (2008).
Friday, 9 July 2021
Something Cult, Foreign-Language or Indie #247: Ten Canoes (2006).
In Arnhem Land, before Western influence, ten Aboriginal men work together as hunters. Young Dayindi (Jamie Gulpilil, whose father David narrates the movie) is told a story about another young man from even further back in history who coveted one of his sisters-in-law and eventually killed a member of another tried, for which he faced grave penalties. This tale resonates with Dayindi because it echoes his own situation.
Ten Canoes won the 2006 AFI Award for Best Film, and its intentions as the first movie entirely in indigenous Australian language are admirable. Plus, it did initially captivate me as a study of pre-European settlement life among Australia's First Nations peoples. But then, as it consciously goes out of its way to assert its arthouse intentions, for me it proved Rolf de Heer's status as arguably the most pretentious filmmaker in Australia. He co-directed it, to his credit, with the indigenous Peter Djigirr, but Djigirr's instincts to me didn't seem to have prevailed over de Heer's as perhaps they should have. There's lush natural photography and engaging non-professional performances here, but neither of those can counter de Heer's insistence on telling this narrative as alternatively as possible, and the lack of a score doesn't help.
De Heer obviously cared about this story of the first Australians; otherwise he wouldn't have made it. But I came away from it genuinely thinking Warwick Thornton or Rachel Perkins, two acclaimed Aboriginal filmmakers, would have made it into a far more accessible, insightful and moving film. 6/10.
Saturday, 3 July 2021
Something Cult, Foreign-Language or Indie #246: A Silent Voice (2016).
Shoko Nishimiya (Saori Hayami in the Japanese-language version; Lexi Cowdon doing the English dub) is a new student at her school. She's also deaf, and uses a notebook to communicate with her classmates because none of them know sign language. Among them is hot-headed Shoya Ishida (Miyu Irino and Mayu Matsuoko in the Japanese-language version; Robbie Damond dubbing him), a boy who bullies poor Shoko so relentlessly she again has to change schools. This deservedly makes Shoya himself an outcast at school. Then, several years later in high school, his behaviour towards Shoko torments him so much he plans to commit suicide, but not before trying to right that wrong. Shoya now tries to track Shoko down in order to reconcile with her before ending his life.
This anime adaptation of Yoshitoko Oima's manga is brilliant, but almost downbeat enough to make Grave of the Fireflies, a tragic war drama, resemble a slapstick comedy. Yet nonetheless, it's a very valuable and rewarding watch. Director Naoko Yamada and screenwriter Reiko Yoshida both wisely approach this awfully serious thematic territory with a very delicate, restrained touch (yet without sanitising anything), Yamada unites the visuals (realised with deliberately varying animation styles for the dream sequences and so on) with assurance and she paces it all appropriately. The English voice cast (I saw the dubbed version) all give authentic and mature turns (as I'm sure their Japanese counterparts do), and Kensuke Ushio provides a strong and most unusual score: it's very pounding, but only to fully reflect what's going through Shoya' troubled mind. It's arguably just slightly overlong at 130 minutes, but despite that, A Silent Voice is a very effective meditation on guilt, isolation, identity and redemption. 9/10.
On how I was body-shamed.
Alright, buckle back up, because I need to get personal and emotional again. You've already read this entry's title so you know the subject, but let me elaborate on it nonetheless.
I was super-skinny as a child. I mean almost rail-thin. That was genetic; believe me, I've always had a big appetite, but an unusually fast metabolism, and nobody in my family has ever been overweight, to my knowledge. Almost every day in primary school I was called names like "Skinny legs," "Chicken legs" et cetera, I was frequently asked why I was so skinny or if I was anorexic or if I ate everything on my plate at dinner. (Let me also state here that in hindsight I wonder how so many of my classmates then knew what "anorexic" even meant.) Naturally, because of my build I was also usually among the very last to be chosen in PE class.
I've recently been re-watching Glee, and this scene from a season four episode resonated with me, even more than when I first saw it, to the point where it made me think back to those days.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9q_cNyMm9XE
Someone having weight issues, be it obesity as seen there or skinniness, should never make them a subject of mockery, and while body-shaming indeed says far more about the culprit than the target (and may I remind people here that both genders can fit in both of those categories), people who witness or hear it when it happens need to put their foot down and intervene. This reflective mood that scene put me in has also made me realise why, in 2017 on Facebook, I felt compelled to make a post defending a young woman who was deluged with abuse after being featured on the cover of Vogue UK as a plus-size model.
Everybody can help how their appearance evolves, with make-up and cosmetic surgery and whatnot. But nobody can help what physical genes they inherited, but everybody can help how they feel about others' physiques. Body-shaming stops with me, and hopefully with you, too.
Thursday, 10 June 2021
On the debate of: "Asperger syndrome" or "Autistic spectrum disorder"?
This is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or the DSM for short. It's practically a bible in the psychiatry field. Now, I'm not criticising it in any way; I couldn't even if I wanted to, because I haven't read it. Anyhow, in 2013 for its fifth edition, Asperger syndrome (along with other pervasive developmental disorders) was re-categorised in it as simply "Autism spectrum disorder." This was done primarily, to my knowledge, because it had recently emerged that its namesake, the Austrian pediatrician Hans Asperger, was involved in Nazi Germany's eugenics program which killed and injured countless disabled adults and children. (To put that into perspective, Asperger syndrome was given that name in 1994.)
Now, I have come to accept that fact about him, and I do not mean to trivialise it in any way. Nobody should. But he was by no means the only doctor (and I don't just mean the medical sort) who was, or is, guilty of evil or negative things. He certainly wasn't the only such one in Nazi Germany; many Nazi doctors were later involved in the creation of thalidomide, maybe the worst medical scandal of the 20th century. However, I digress. for all the damage he did elsewhere, Asperger still helped to pioneer autism research and in any case, somebody else named Asperger syndrome after him. And my key point with this post is this: AS may not exist as a diagnosis anymore, but it still does as a condition. It's simply listed under a different name. I can't help but liken it, in that sense, to manic depression. That still exists; it's just known as bipolar disorder today.
Nonetheless, for several reasons, I interchangeably say I'm autistic and that I have Asperger's, at specific times in conversation. I have no issue with either label. Regardless, I'm certain there are many Aspies out there, particularly ones older than me and who were diagnosed before me, for whom identifying as having Asperger's has become very much routine (and remember, routine is enormously important for most autistics), even if they know of Dr. Asperger's crimes. That's another reason why we should let people identify as whatever, and whoever, they want to. Anyway, the spectrum is long and vast, and everybody on it, whether high- or low-functioning, has something to bring to the world.